To the Stockholders of Eagle Materials Inc.:

The annual meeting of stockholders of Eagle Materials Inc., which we refer to as the “Company,” will be held at Arlington Hall at Leethe Hilton Dallas Park 3333 Turtle Creek Blvd.,Cities, 5954 Luther Lane, Dallas, Texas 75219,TX 75225, at 8:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday,Wednesday, August 3, 2017. 5, 2020.*

At the meeting, stockholders will vote on:

The Company’s Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 6, 20178, 2020 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Only record holders of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, which we refer to as our “Common Stock,” at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. A list of holders of Common Stock will be available for examination by any stockholder at the meeting and, during theten-day period preceding the meeting date at the executive offices of the Company located at 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd.5960 Berkshire Ln., Suite 1100,900, Dallas, Texas 75219-4487.75225.

For further information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the annual meeting, I urge you to carefully read the accompanying proxy statement.If you have questions about these proposals or would like additional copies of the proxy statement, please contact: Eagle Materials Inc., Attention: James H. Graass, Secretary, 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd.5960 Berkshire Ln., Suite 1100,900, Dallas, Texas 75219-448775225 (telephone: (214)432-2000).

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting in person, please vote through the Internet (as described in the Notice) or by telephone or fill in, sign, date and promptly return the accompanying form of proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope so that your shares may be represented and voted at the annual meeting. This will not limit your right to attend or vote in person at the annual meeting. Your proxy will be returned to you if you choose to attend the annual meeting and request that it be returned. Shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained in your proxy, but if any proxies that are signed and returned to us do not specify a vote on any proposal, such proxies will be voted in the manner, if any, recommended by the Board.

Dallas, Texas

June 23, 201726, 2020

INTRODUCTION

The accompanying proxy, mailed or provided online, together with this proxy statement, is solicited by and on behalf of the Board of Directors of Eagle Materials Inc., which we refer to as the “Company,” for use at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. References in this proxy statement to “we,” “us,” “our” or like terms also refer to the Company. References to our “Board of Directors” or “Board” refer to the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of the Company. The Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, this proxy statement and accompanying proxy were first mailed to our stockholders on or about June 23, 2017.26, 2020.

Date, Time and Place of the Annual Meeting

The 20172020 annual meeting of our stockholders will be held at Arlington Hall at Leethe Hilton Dallas Park 3333 Turtle Creek Blvd.,Cities, 5954 Luther Lane, Dallas, Texas 75219,TX 75225, at 8:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday,Wednesday, August  3, 2017.5, 2020. (Please see the note regarding COVID-19 on the above Notice.)

Purposes of the Annual Meeting and Recommendations of our Board of Directors

At the meeting, action will be taken upon the following matters:

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “for”“FOR” the election of its twofour nominees for director named in this proxy statement.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “for”“FOR” thenon-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers.

Our Board of Directors does not make a recommendation regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote “for”“FOR” the approval of the expected appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018.2021.

Our Board of Directors does not know of any matters to be acted upon at the meeting other than the matters set forth in items (1) through (4)(3) above.

Who Can Vote

The record date for the determination of holders of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, which we refer to as our “Common Stock,” entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, is the close of business on June 6, 2017.8, 2020. In this proxy statement, we refer to this date as the “record date.” As of the record date, there were 48,567,96341,756,684 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting. Our stock transfer books will not be closed in connection with the meeting. Our Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or “NYSE,” under the symbol “EXP.”

How Proxies Will be Voted

Shares represented by valid proxies will be voted at the meeting in accordance with the directions given. If the enclosed proxy card is signed and returned without any direction given, the shares will be voted in the manner, if any, recommended by the Board. The Board does not intend to present, and has no information indicating that others will present, any business at the annual meeting other than as set forth in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if other matters requiring the vote of our stockholders properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named

in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the proxies held by them in accordance with their best judgment in such matters.

How to Revoke Your Proxy

You have the unconditional right to revoke your proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof by submitting a later-dated proxy, by attending the meeting and voting in person, or by written notice to us addressed to: Eagle Materials Inc., Attention: James H. Graass, Secretary, 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd.5960 Berkshire Ln., Suite 1100,900, Dallas, Texas 75219-4487.75225. No such revocation shall be effective, however, unless and until received by the Company at or prior to the meeting.

Quorum and Required Vote

The presence at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our capital stock entitled to vote on any matter shall constitute a quorum for purposes of such matter. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be included in determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting. The holders of Common Stock will be entitled to one vote per share on each matter that may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. There is no cumulative voting.

Pursuant to the rules of the NYSE, brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote in the election of directors if they did not receive instructions from the beneficial owner because the election of directors is not considered a “routine” matter. The advisory vote regarding executive compensation is also not considered “routine,” and brokers may not vote your shares with respect to such matter without instructions from you.

Expenses of Soliciting Proxies

The cost of soliciting proxies for the meeting will be borne by the Company. Solicitations may be made on behalf of our Board by mail, personal interview, telephone or other electronic means by officers and other employees of the Company, who will receive no additional compensation therefor. To aid in the solicitation of proxies, we have retained the firm of Okapi Partners,Kingsdale Advisors, which will receive a fee of approximately $9,500,$20,000, in addition to the reimbursement ofout-of-pocket expenses.

We will request banks, brokers, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other record holders to

forward copies of this proxy statement to persons on whose behalf they hold shares of Common Stock and to request authority for the exercise of proxies by the record holders on behalf of those persons. In compliance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC,” and the NYSE, we will reimburse such persons for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our Common Stock.

How You Can Vote

You can vote your shares at the meeting, by telephone, over the Internet or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy in the enclosed envelope. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact the Company’s strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Kingsdale Advisors, at 1-888-327-0821 (toll free in North America), or at 416-867-2272 (collect outside North America), or by email atcontactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

General

Our Board of Directors is the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except with respect to those matters reserved to our stockholders. The primary responsibilities of our Board include:

Members of our Board of Directors are divided into three classes based on their term of office (Class I, II and III). The directors in each such class hold office for staggered terms of three years each. At present, each class has four directors, except for Class I, which has three directors.

Retirement of Laurence E. Hirsch

Mr. Laurence E. Hirsch, a Class II director who is our current Chairman and has been a director since 1985, will retire at the annual meeting and is not seeking reelection. It is anticipated that upon Mr. Hirsch’s retirement, Richard R. Stewart, currently our Vice Chairman, will succeed Mr. Hirsch as Chairman, and Michael R. Nicolais will be appointed Vice Chairman. The Company and the Board of Directors recognize and sincerely thank Mr. Hirsch for his exemplary leadership, dedication and service to the Company and its shareholders for the last 32 years. The following table shows the composition of our Board after the annual meeting, assuming the election of the proposed slate of Class II director nominees and the retirement of Mr. Hirsch:nominees:

Director Independence

NYSE corporate governance rules require that our Board of Directors be comprised of a majority of independent directors. Our Board of Directors has determined, upon the recommendation of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which we refer to as our “Governance Committee,” that all members of our Board of Directors, other than Mr.Messrs. Haack and Powers, are “independent” within the meaning of the specific provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which

we refer to as the “Exchange Act,” and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE.

In determining that eightnine of our nineeleven directors are “independent,” our Board of Directors considered the following facts:

Director Qualifications

Set forth below is information about the nominees standing for election at our 20172020 annual meeting, as well as our continuing directors whose terms of office do not expire at such annual meeting. The biographical information appearing below regarding

the nominees for director and continuing directors has been furnished to us by the respective nominees and directors. Also included below is a brief description of how each individual’s experience qualifies him or her to serve as a director of the Company.

Career Highlights: Ms. Carter has been a director of Installed Building Products, Inc., an installer of insulation and complementary building products, since 2014. She serves as IBP’s lead independent director, the Chair of its Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. From 2010 to 2015, Ms. Carter served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary for RealPage, Inc. Since 1998, Ms. Carter has served as the President and founder of Living Mountain Capital, L.L.C., a business advisory firm. She also sits on the executive board of the NACD North Texas Chapter.

Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Carter brings to the Board and the committees on which she serves her proven leadership and business experience gained as a general counsel and director at other public companies. Ms. Carter also brings strategy, business development, M&A experience and corporate governance and finance knowledge gained from over 20 years of executive and board experience at other public companies.

Career Highlights: In January 2020, Mr. Nicolais founded and is managing partner of Roble Drive Investment Company, a private investment firm, following his retirement as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Highlander Partners L.P., an investment partnership—an office he held from January 2017 through December 2019. Previously, Mr. Nicolais served Highlander Partners as President from April 2004 through December 2016. From August 2002 until March 2004, Mr. Nicolais served as Managing Director of Stephens, Inc., an investment banking firm. Prior to joining Stephens, Inc., he was a partner in the private investment firm of Olivhan Investments, L.P. from March 2001 until August 2002. From August 1986 to December 2000, he was employed by Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation’s Investment Banking Division, most recently in the position of Managing Director and co-head of that firm’s Dallas office.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Nicolais brings to the Board and the committees on which he serves his extensive knowledge of capital markets, mergers and acquisitions and financial analysis and financial oversight experience gained through his work as an investment banker and investment manager.

Career Highlights: In 2002, Ms. Ricciardello retired after a 20-year career with Reliant Energy Inc., a leading independent power producer and marketer. She served in various financial management positions with the company, including Comptroller, Vice President and most recently Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Ms. Ricciardello served as a director of Noble Corporation from 2003 until May 2020 and as a director of EnLink Midstream from 2014 until 2018. She served on the board of U.S. Concrete, Inc. from 2003 until 2010. Ms. Ricciardello currently sits on the executive council of the NACD TriCities Chapter (Houston).

Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Ricciardello is a licensed Certified Public Accountant and a financial executive with over 30 years of experience. She brings to the Board her extensive experience with corporate finance, accounting and tax matters.

Career Highlights: From 1998 until 2006 Mr. Stewart served as President and CEO of GE Aero Energy, a division of GE Power Systems and as an officer of General Electric Company. Mr. Stewart retired from General Electric in 2006. Mr. Stewart’s career at General Electric began in 1998 as a result of General Electric’s acquisition of the gas turbine business of Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. Mr. Stewart began his career at Stewart & Stevenson in 1972 and while at Stewart & Stevenson served in various positions including as Group President and member of the board of directors. Mr. Stewart also served as a director of Plug Power Inc. from July of 2003 to March of 2006. Mr. Stewart was a director of Lufkin Industries, Inc. from 2009 until its acquisition by GE Oil & Gas in 2013 and served a director of Exterran Corp. from 2015 to 2018.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Stewart brings to the Board and the committees on which he serves his proven leadership and business experience as the former CEO of a manufacturing company. Mr. Stewart also brings corporate governance experience gained from membership on the boards of other public companies and as an officer with General Electric.

Career Highlights: Mr. Barnett retired in 2003 from his position as a Director in the Dallas office of McKinsey & Company, Inc., an international consulting firm, after 23 years of employment, where he led the firm’s Strategy Practice. Mr. Barnett has taught MBA students at the Yale School of Management and the Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business at Rice University. Mr. Barnett’s book,The Strategic Career: Let Business Principles Guide You, was released in 2015.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Barnett brings to the Board and the committees on which he serves his corporate governance and strategy development and implementation experience gained from his long career in management consulting.

Career Highlights: Mr. Beckwitt is the Chief Executive Officer of Lennar Corporation. He also serves on the Lennar Board of Directors. He joined Lennar in March 2006 as an Executive Vice President, became President in April 2011 and was promoted to CEO in April 2018. Mr. Beckwitt served on the Board of Directors of D.R. Horton, Inc. from 1993 to November 2003. From 1993 to March 2000, he held various executive officer positions at D.R. Horton, including President of the Company. From March 2000 to April 2003, Mr. Beckwitt was the owner and principal of EVP Capital, L.P., a venture capital and real estate advisory company. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Beckwitt worked in the Mergers and Acquisitions and Corporate Finance

Departments at Lehman Brothers. Mr. Beckwitt also served as a director of Five Point Holdings from May 2016 to June 2020.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Beckwitt brings to the Board and the committees on which he serves his extensive executive experience gained through his service as the President and executive officer of public companies within the homebuilding industry, as well as finance-related experience with a major investment banking firm.

Career Highlights: Mr. Bowman served as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of SOURCECORP from 1996 until 2011. Prior to 1996, Mr. Bowman was a senior executive at First Data Corporation. Mr. Bowman serves as an Executive Partner with Teakwood Capital and on the board of iiPay, LTD.

Skills and Experience: Mr. Bowman brings to the Board and the Compensation Committee his proven leadership and business experience as the retired CEO of an expanding company. Mr. Bowman also brings corporate governance, finance and compensation knowledge gained from his experience at other public companies.

Career Highlights: Mr. Haack has been the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since July 1, 2019. Prior to that time, he has served as President and

Chief Operating Officer since August 2018 and was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from December 2014 through August 2018. Mr. Haack was employed at Halliburton Energy Services for the 17 years prior to joining the Company, most recently as Global Operations Manager at Halliburton’s Sperry Drilling division).

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Haack brings to the Board his extensive knowledge of the Company’s operations, as well as his executive and operations experience gained in heavy industry over the previous 20 years.

Career Highlights: Mr. Damiris served as Chief Executive Officer and President of HollyFrontier Corporation from 2016 through 2019 and as a director from 2015 through 2019. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from September 2014 to January 2016 and as Senior Vice President, Supply and Marketing from January 2008 until September 2014. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Damiris also served as a director of Holly Logistics Services, L.L.C., the general partner of the general partner of Holly Energy Partners, L.P., since February 2016, as CEO since November 2016 and as President since February 2017.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Damiris brings to the Board and the Compensation Committee his extensive management and operational experience gained from his time as a senior executive at a large, public industrial company.

Career Highlights: Mr. Ellen retired as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President at Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. in July 2018, having served in that capacity since April 2010. Mr. Ellen also served as the Chief Financial Officer and Senior

Vice President - Finance of Snap-on Inc. from November 2002 to March 2010.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Ellen brings to the Board and the Audit Committee his extensive management, finance and audit experience gained from over 25 years serving as chief financial officer with public and private companies and prior experience with a major public accounting firm.

Career Highlights: Mr. Powers served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2016 until his retirement on July 1, 2019. Prior to his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Powers served as Executive Vice President – Gypsum of the Company and as President of American Gypsum Company LLC, a subsidiary of the Company (“American Gypsum”), since January 2005. Mr. Powers previously served as Executive Vice President – Marketing, Sales and Distribution of American Gypsum, beginning in June 2002.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Powers brings to the Board his extensive executive and operations experience in the construction products industry, including over 35 years of experience in the gypsum industry.

Board Meetings and Attendance Records

During the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, our Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings and three15 special meetings. During such fiscal year, all of the incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board on which they served. In accordance with our informal policy, we anticipate that all continuing directors and nominees will attend our 20172020 annual stockholders meeting. All of our then-current directors attended our 20162019 annual meeting. We strongly encourage all directors to attend our stockholder meetings. Ournon-employee directors (which currently constitute all our directors, except for Mr. Powers)Haack) meet immediately after all Board meetings without management present. The Chairman presides at all executive sessions of thenon-employee directors.

Board compensation for the12-month period from August 20162019 through July 20172020 was approved by our Board of Directors in August 2016.2019. The Board adopted a director compensation structure in which directors who are not employees of the Company or any of our subsidiaries received compensation for their services during the12-month period from August 20162019 through July 20172020 by electing one of the following two compensation package alternatives:

The grant date value of the equity grant under either alternative is allocated between restricted stock and options to purchase Common Stock (based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) with respect to eachnon-employee director.

In accordance with the terms of the Eagle Materials Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our “Incentive Plan,” the exercise price of stock options is set at the closing price of the Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. The number of option shares granted is determined as of the date of grant by using the Black-Scholes method. All theNo stock options were granted to directors in August 2016 were fully exercisable when granted and have aten-year term.as part of this year’s package.

The number of shares of restricted stock is determined as of the date of grant using the closing price of the Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. The restricted stock granted to directors in August 20162019 was earned at the time of grant; however, the shares willdid not become fully vested

(unrestricted) until the director’s service onearliest to occur of (i) February 6, 2020; (ii) the Board terminates because ofrecipient’s retirement from the director’s death or the director’s retirementBoard in accordance with the Company’s director retirement policy, or under such circumstances as are approved by the Compensation Committee.Committee; or (iii) the recipient’s death. During the restriction period the director will have the right to vote the shares. In addition, the director will also be entitled to cash dividends as and when the Company issues a cash dividend on the Common Stock. Notwithstanding the above, the restricted shares issued to Mr. Hirsch do not have voting rights and are not entitled to cash dividends, but rather to a dividend-equivalent payment.

Non-employee directors who chair committees of the Board of Directors receive additional annual compensation. The Governance Committee Chair receives a fee of $15,000 per year. The chairs of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee each receive a fee of $20,000 per year. The Vice Chairman of the Board receives a fee of $35,000 per year, and the Chairman of the Board receives a fee of $50,000$170,000 per year. Chairpersons who choose compensation package alternative one (part equity and part cash) receive this additional compensation in the form of cash. Chairpersons who choose compensation package alternative two (all equity) receive this additional compensation in the form of equity, in which case a 30% premium is added to such fees when valuing the equity to be received by such chairperson.

Ifnon-employee directors hold unvested restricted stock units, which we refer to as “RSUs,” granted as part of director compensation in prior fiscal years (which currently only includes Messrs. Barnett, Hirsch andMr. Nicolais), these directors will receive dividend equivalent units as and when the Company pays a cash dividend on the Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the RSUs.

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses of attending meetings.

(10)(8)

Mr. Ellen is Chair of the Audit Committee. He selected the compensation package where he receives a portion of his director compensation in the form of equity and a portion in cash. Mr. Ellen received his committee chairperson fee in cash.

(11)(9)

Mr. Hirsch is theNicolais served as Chairman of the Board.Board during fiscal 2020. He elected to receive 100% of his director compensation in the form of equity (including his chairperson fee). Mr. Hirsch will retire atNicolais received a cash payment of $25,000 for his service as Chairman of the 2017 annual meeting.Board for a portion of the board year.

(12)(10)

Includes $1,106 Mr. Powers retired as our Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2019. He continues to serve as a non-employee director. The compensation paid to

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The positions of Chairman of the Board and CEOChief Executive Officer (“CEO”) are performed by two different persons.individuals. Mr. Powers,Haack, our CEO, focuses on theday-to-day operation of the Company’s businesses and participates in both operational and long-term strategy and development. Mr. Hirsch,Nicolais, our Chairman, oversees the Company’s general strategic direction and leads and manages the Board. Mr. Stewart, our Vice Chairman, fulfills the Chairman’s duties in the event that Mr. Hirsch is unavailable.

As part of its primary risk management function, the Audit Committee oversees the preparation by management of a risk report on a quarterly basis. However, our entire Board of Directors is also charged with, and is actively involved in, identifying, evaluating and managing risks on behalf of the Company, and the Board undertakes to hold discussions on these topics with management and the Audit Committee throughout the year. Further, the independent directors address risk management in executive sessions without management present. As appropriate in the context of their chartered roles, the Board’s other committees also perform risk management and oversight activities during the year. For example, the Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing governance issues that may create governance risks, such as board composition, director selection and other

governance policies and practices that are critical to the success of the Company.

Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs

Consistent with SEC disclosure requirements, management, the Compensation Committee and the Board have assessed the Company’s compensation programs. Based upon all of the facts and circumstances available to the Company at the time of the filing of this Proxy Statement, the Board has concluded that risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company or encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking.

This assessment was overseen by the Compensation Committee, in consultation with management. The Board reviewed the compensation policies and practices in effect for our executive officers, senior management and other employees and assessed the features the Company has built into the compensation programs to discourage excessive risk-taking. These features include, among other things, a balance between different elements of compensation, use of different time periods and performance metrics for different elements of compensation, restrictions on pricing authority, review and approval of material contracts, and stock ownership guidelines for senior management.

Board Committees

The standing committees of our Board of Directors include the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance Committee and the

Executive Committee. The following table lists the chairperson and members of each committee as of March 31, 2017,2020, and the number of meetings held by each committee during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017:2020:

Audit Committee

Our Board has a standing Audit Committee, composed of at least three independent directors. Our Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence and appointment of our independent auditors and the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors. Our Audit Committee is governed by an amended and restated

Audit Committee charter, a copy of which may be viewed on our website atwww.eaglematerials.com and will be provided free of charge upon written request to our Secretary at our principal executive office.

Our Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of applicable (1) corporate governance rules of the NYSE and (2) requirements set forth in the Exchange Act and the applicable SEC rules. In addition, our Board has determined that each member of our

Audit Committee satisfies applicable NYSE standards for financial literacy and that, based on his auditing and financial experience, including over 25 years of experience as a chief financial officer with public and private companies and prior experience with a major public accounting firm, Mr. Ellen is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.

Unless otherwise determined by the Board, no member of our Audit Committee may serve as a member of an audit committee of more than two other public companies.

Certain key functions and responsibilities of our Audit Committee are to:

Our Audit Committee’s report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 is presented below under the heading “Audit Committee Report.”

Our Audit Committee meets separately with our independent auditors and with members of our internal audit staff outside the presence of the Company’s management or other employees to discuss matters of concern, to receive recommendations or suggestions for change and to exchange relevant views and information.

Compensation Committee

Our Board’s Compensation Committee is composed of independent directors who meet the corporate governance standards of the NYSE including the enhanced NYSE independence requirements for directors serving on compensation committees, qualify as“non-employee “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule16b-3(b)(3) of the Exchange Act and as “outside directors” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code.

Under its amended and restated charter, which you may review on our web site atwww.eaglematerials.com (and a copy of which will be provided to you free of charge upon written request to our Secretary at our principal executive office), the primary purposes of our Compensation Committee are to assist the Board in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives and to direct the preparation of the reports regarding executive compensation that the rules of the SEC require to be included in our annual proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee is authorized to hire outside advisers after taking into account all factors relevant to the adviser’s independence from management. For additional information regarding outside advisers engaged by the Compensation Committee, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 2122 of this proxy statement.

Certain key functions and responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to:

In accordance with the terms of our Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has delegated to the Special Situation Stock Option Committee (whose sole member is our CEO) the authority to grant time-vesting stock options in special circumstances. Under this authorization, the Special Situation Stock Option Committee may grant stock options to newly-hired employees and newly-promoted employees, under terms set by the Compensation Committee. This authority for fiscal 2018,2021, which expires on May 31, 2018,2021, is limited to an aggregate of 60,000 option shares, no one individual may receive more than 15,000 option shares, and Section 16 reporting persons may not receive awards pursuant to this authority. Stock options granted under this delegation of authority vest 20% per year commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. During fiscal 2017, 17,5002020, 2,483 stock options were granted to employees under this authority out of a maximum of 60,000.

Our Compensation Committee’s report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 is presented below under the heading “Compensation Committee Report” beginning on page 2021 of this proxy statement.

Our Compensation Committee meets as often as it deems appropriate, but no less than twice per year.

Governance Committee

Our Board’s Governance Committee is composed of independent directors who meet the corporate governance standards of the NYSE. The primary purposes of this committee are: (1) to advise and counsel our Board and management regarding, and oversee, our governance, including our Board’s selection of directors; (2) to develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles for the Company; and (3) to oversee the evaluation of our Board and management.

Our Governance Committee has adopted a written charter, and our Board has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. Both the Governance Committee charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines may be viewed on our web site atwww.eaglematerials.com and will be provided free of charge upon written request to our Secretary at our principal executive office.

Certain key functions and responsibilities of our Governance Committee are to:

The Governance Committee initiates and oversees an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board and each committee, as well as the composition, organization (including committee structure, membership and leadership) and practices of the Board. This evaluation is confidentialanonymous as to each member of the Board and its committees. Part of the Governance Committee’s self-evaluation process involves an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance policies, which includes the Company’s policies surrounding diversity.

Among the criteria the Governance Committee uses in evaluating the suitability of individual nominees for director (whether such nominations are made by management, a stockholder or otherwise) are their

integrity, experience, achievements, judgment, intelligence, personal character, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties and the likelihood that he or she will be able to serve on the Board for a sustained period, giving due consideration to diversity in perspectives, backgrounds, business experiences, professional expertise, gender and ethnic background. Subject to its fiduciary duties and applicable laws and regulations, when searching for new directors, the Governance Committee is charged with endeavoring to identify highly qualified diverse candidates, including women and individuals from minority groups, to include in the pool of candidates from which director nominees are chosen.

Members of the Governance Committee, other members of the Board or executive officers may, from time to time, identify potential candidates for nomination to our Board. All proposed nominees, including candidates recommended for nomination by stockholders in accordance with the procedures described below, will be evaluated in light of the criteria described above and the projected needs of the Board at the time. As set forth in its charter, the Governance Committee may retain a search firm to assist in identifying potential candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors.

Our Governance Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders for election to our Board. A stockholder who wishes to recommend a candidate for evaluation by our Governance Committee should forward the candidate’s name, business or residence address, principal occupation or employment and a description of the candidate’s qualifications to the Chairman of the Governance Committee at the following address: Eagle Materials Inc., Attention: Secretary, 3811 Turtle Creek Boulevard,5960 Berkshire Ln., Suite 1100,900, Dallas, Texas 75219-4487.75225.

Our Bylaws provide that, to be considered at the 20182021 annual meeting, stockholder nominations for the Board of Directors must be submitted in writing and received by our Secretary at the executive offices of the Company during the period beginning on February 3, 20184, 2021 and ending May 4, 2018,5, 2021, and must contain the information specified by and otherwise comply with the terms of our Bylaws. Any stockholder wishing to receive a copy of our Bylaws should direct a written request to our Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices.

No nominees for election to the Board at our 20172020 annual meeting of stockholders were submitted by stockholders or groups of stockholders owning more than 5% of our Common Stock.

Executive Committee

The principal function of our Board’s Executive Committee is to exercise all of the powers of the Board to direct our business and affairs between meetings of the Board, except that the Executive Committee may not amend our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, adopt an agreement of merger or consolidation under Delaware law, recommend the sale of all or substantially all of our assets or recommend the dissolution of the Company or the revocation of a dissolution. In addition, unless authorized by resolution of our Board of Directors, the Executive Committee may not declare a dividend, authorize the issuance of stock or adopt a certificate of ownership and merger under Delaware law.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our Compensation Committee had a relationship during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 that requires disclosure as a Compensation Committee interlock.

How to Contact Our Board

Shareholders and other interested parties can communicate directly with our Board, a committee of our Board, our independent directors as a group, our Chairman of the Board or any other individual member of our Board by sending the communication to Eagle Materials Inc., 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd.5960 Berkshire Ln., Suite 1100,900, Dallas, Texas 75219-4487,75225, to the attention of the director or directors of your choice (e.g., “Attention: Chairman of the Board of Directors” or “Attention: All Independent Directors,” etc.). We will relay communications addressed in this manner as appropriate. Communications addressed to the attention of the entire Board are forwarded to the Chairman of the Board for review and further handling.

The following list sets forth the names, ages as of the date of this proxy statement and principal occupations of each person who was an executive officer of the Company during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172020 and who is not also a member of our Board. Except as noted below, allAll of these persons have been elected to serve until the next annual meeting of our Board or until their earlier resignation or removal.

Age: 44

Position: Executive Vice President – Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer (has held current office since August 2009; Vice President – Investor Relations and Corporate Development from March 2005 through August 2009; Audit Manager with Ernst & Young LLP from April 2002 through September 2004).

Robert S. Stewart

Age: 66

Position: Executive Vice President – Strategy, Corporate Development and Communications (has held current office since August 2009; Senior Vice President of Centex from 2000 through August 2009).

Keith W. Metcalf

Age: 62

Position: President – American Gypsum Company LLC (has held current office since April 2016; Executive Vice President of Sales & Marketing from January 2016 through March 2016; Senior Vice President of Sales & Marketing from July 2009

through December 2015; and Vice President of Sales, Marketing & Distribution from May 2001 through June 2009). Mr. Metcalf retired from the Company on May 31, 2020.

Gerald J. Essl

Age: 70

Position: Executive Vice President – Cement (has held current office since April 2016; Executive Vice President – Cement/Aggregates and Concrete from January 2003 through March 2016; President of Texas Lehigh Cement Company from 1985 through December 2002). Mr. Essl retired from the Company on May 31, 2020.

James H. Graass

Age: 62

Position: Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (Executive Vice President and General Counsel since November 2000; Mr. Graass was named Secretary of the Company in July 2001).

William R. Devlin

Age: 54

Position: Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (has held current office since August 2009; Vice President and Controller from October 2005 through August 2009; Director of Internal Audit from September 2004 through September 2005; Senior Manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from July 1999 through August 2004).

Executive SummaryOur Year in Review

Our Strong Performance

In fiscal 2020, we continued to grow the heavy side of our business, acquiring Kosmos Cement and a Nevada-based aggregates and concrete producer. We also continued to make progress on our planned separation of our heavy and light businesses into two independent publicly traded companies. The timing of the separation has become uncertain in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We have maintained our strong balance sheet and financial flexibility through this year notwithstanding the repurchase of approximately 8% of our outstanding shares (in the first half of the fiscal year) and substantial investments in growth (in the latter half of the fiscal year).

Please note that the executive compensation payouts described in this proxy statement relate to the Company’s fiscal 2020 performance which concluded prior to the outbreak of COVID-19. While we are unable to determine the duration or scope of the negative impact of COVID-19 to our financial results at this time, 2020 performance-based compensation plans will likely be negatively impacted. During this unprecedented time, the Compensation Committee’s long-standing principles will guide its decision-making process. As noted elsewhere in this proxy statement, these guiding principles include aligning pay with performance; driving business results and long-term shareholder value; and paying competitively, while mitigating compensation-related risk and supporting effective succession planning.

Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis is intended to provide investors with a more complete understanding of our compensation policies and decisions during fiscal 2020 for the following persons who were “Named Executive Officers” during such fiscal year:

Transitions Involving Our Named Executive Officers

During fiscal 2020, we experienced some transitions involving our Named Executive Officers. Effective on July 1, 2019, Mr. Powers retired from his position as Chief Executive Officer, continuing to serve as a member of our Board of Directors. Effective upon his retirement as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Powers entered into an Advisory Agreement with the Company, as discussed in greater detail in the “Chief Executive Officer Transition” on page 28 of this proxy statement.

Effective at the time of the retirement of Mr. Powers, Mr. Haack, who had been serving as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, was appointed as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (he had joined the Board of Directors in June 2019).

Compensation Philosophy

Our Core Tenet: Pay for Performance

Our compensation philosophy is based on the principles that executive compensation should:

Our performance-based compensation philosophy is evidenced by the charts below showing that 54% of our Chief Executive Officer’s target compensation opportunity for fiscal 2020 and 57% of our other Named Executive Officers’ target compensation opportunity for fiscal 2020 was performance-based or at-risk.

We believe that a significant portion of an executive’s compensation should be “at risk” – that is, dependent upon our operational and financial performance and the individual’s performance. The key features of our

executive compensation program include the following:

To achieve our compensation objectives for fiscal 2020, our executive compensation program used a combination of short-term and long-term elements: (1) annual salary, (2) annual incentive bonus, and (3) long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock, both with time and performance vesting conditions. Each element of long-term and short-term compensation is discussed more fully below under the heading “Primary Elements of Executive Compensation” on page 28 of this proxy statement.

Our Compensation Practices

Pay-for-performance is a longstanding core tenet of our compensation philosophy and one of the keys to Eagle’s long-term success. For years, our executive compensation programs have incorporatedpay-for-performance and many other compensation best practices, including the following:

Things We Don’t Do

Things We Do

For fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee made these determinations at two separate meetings held early in the fiscal year, in May 2016.

The Compensation Committee made these determinations for fiscal 20172020 at a meetingtwo meetings held after the completion of the fiscal year, in May 2017.

no conflict of interest exists that would prevent L&A from independently advising the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Peers

The data used by L&A in its survey of compensation, which we refer to as the “compensation study,” was weighted so that 50% was from published surveys from Towers Watson, Economic Research Institute, Mercer, Pay Factors, Kenexa and WorldatWork and 50% was from disclosurecompensation disclosures included in compensationthe proxy statements of members of our peer group proxy statements.group. At the beginning of fiscal 20172020 (spring of 2016)2019), L&A reviewed the Company’s current peer group for appropriateness and provided the Compensation Committee with recommendations for any additional peers to be included. L&A analyzed the Company’s peer group and potential additional companiesmodifications based on (1) other similar companies within similar industries, (2) revenue, (3) asset size, (4) market capitalization, (4)and (5) enterprise value, (5) asset size (6) net income, (7) EBITDA and(8) one-year and three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”). value.

Based on this analysis, L&A recommended removal of the following peersone peer used in fiscal 2016: Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. (merged with FerroAtlantica);2019: KapStone Paper and Newpark Resources, Inc. (too small by several metrics).Packaging Corporation, which had been acquired. Additionally, L&A recommended the addition of the following companiesone company to the peer group: Summit Materials Inc., Continental Building Products, Inc., U.S. Concrete, Inc. and HeadwatersGranite Construction Incorporated. Based on L&A’s recommendation, the Compensation Committee utilized the following15-company peer group in analyzing fiscal 20172020 compensation (“compensation peer group”):

Company Name		Ticker		Business Description
Armstrong Worldwide Industries, Inc.		AWI		Designs, manufactures and sells flooring products and ceiling systems.
Continental Building Products, Inc.		CBPX		Manufactures and sells gypsum wallboard and complementary finishing products in the eastern United States and eastern Canada.
EnPro Industries, Inc.		NPO		Designs, develops, manufactures and markets engineered industrial products.
Headwaters Granite Construction Incorporated		HW		Provides products and services to building and construction materials sectors primarily in the United States and Canada.
James Hardie Industries plc		JHX		Manufactures and sells fiber cement products for interior and exterior building construction applications.
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation		KS		Manufactures and sells containerboard, corrugated products and specialty paper for industrial and consumer markets.
Lennox International Inc.		LII		Manufactures climate controlled products.
Louisiana-Pacific Corp.		LPX		Manufactures and distributes building products for new home construction, repair and remodeling, manufactured housing, and light industrial and commercial construction.
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.		MLM		Produces and sells aggregates for the construction industry.
Masonite International Corporation Silgan Holdings, Inc.		SLGN		Manufactures and sells packaging for consumer goods products worldwide.
Summit Materials, Inc.		SUM		Produces and sells construction materials and related downstream products.
USG Corporation		USG		Manufactures and distributes gypsum wallboard and a wide range of related building materials.
U.S. Concrete, Inc.		USCR		Produces and sells ready-mixed concrete, aggregates and concrete-related products and services for the construction industry in the United States.
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.		SLCA		Domestic producer of commercial silica, a specialized mineral that is a critical input into a variety of end markets, including oil and gas proppants.
Vulcan Materials Company		VMC		Produces and sells construction aggregates: primarily crushed stone, sand and gravel.

L&A delivered its compensation peer analysis report to the Compensation Committee in February 2016,2019, utilizing trailing 12 months financials for revenue, net income and EBITDA;revenue; asset value as of the latest quarterly report on Form10-Q filed by the company; and market capitalization and enterprise value and TSR as of February 10, 2016.14, 2019. The Company’s ranking within the compensation peer group in each of the categories utilized by L&A was as follows:

We are aware that institutional shareholder advisors, such as Institutional Shareholder Services, Glass Lewis and others, utilize methodologies to determine “peer groups” that may differ from our process. We believe that the methodologies they use may result in a peer group that does not provide a close “fit” for Eagle. For example, if the institutional shareholder advisor relies upon GICS codes to identify potential peers, the resulting peer group would include many companies whose operations we view as sufficiently dissimilar to ours as to make comparisons significantly less meaningful. Additionally, if the institutional shareholder advisor constructs a peer group based solely on revenues, the resulting peer group can create a poor fit for two reasons. First, because of accounting rules we are unable to include our 50/50 Texas Lehigh joint venture’s revenues in our revenue line item—we instead account for that entity in a separate line item valuing the equity interest in an unconsolidated joint venture. OurAs a result, in our view, our revenue is, in effect, understated. Second, in our industry, with largeup-front capital projects, we believe that cash flow and operating earnings are more important than revenues when evaluating peers.

For these reasons and in light of the peer analysis described above, we believe that the compensation peer group identified by our Compensation Committee for fiscal 20172020 provides a more appropriate and meaningful basis for assessing our executive compensation.

Chief Executive Officer Transition

On March 4, 2019, the Company announced that Mr. Powers had decided to retire as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective July 1, 2019 (and that he would continue to serve as a non-employee director). On June 19, 2019, the Board approved an Advisory Agreement with Mr. Powers in connection with his retirement, effective July 1, 2019, pursuant to which Mr. Powers agreed to provide advisory services to the Company during the period from his retirement date until March 31, 2020. Under this agreement, Mr. Powers was engaged to provide to management his expertise, experience and industry knowledge during this important transition period during which the Company continued making preparations for the previously announced separation of its Wallboard and Cement businesses.

The advisory services performed by Mr. Powers included providing support, advice, and counsel to the Company’s successor Chief Executive Officer regarding all aspects of the Company’s businesses; consulting with the successor Chief Executive Officer, including with regard to leadership transition; assisting the successor Chief Executive Officer and the management team with any special projects, including specifically with regard to the planned announced separation of the Company’s wallboard business and the cement business and the exploration of alternatives for the Company’s frac sand division; and performing such other services as are consistent with Mr. Powers’s experience and expertise.

The Advisory Agreement also subjects Mr. Powers to a perpetual confidentiality covenant and, for a period of one year following his retirement date, covenants concerning noncompetition, nonsolicitation of customers, clients and suppliers and nonsolicitation of employees.

In consideration for Mr. Powers’s services, he received an advisory fee of $1,200,000, payable in monthly installments. In addition, the Board approved his retirement for purposes of his outstanding earned but unvested restricted stock awards, resulting in the vesting of such awards as of his retirement date.

The Advisory Agreement provides that, following Mr. Powers’s retirement, he would continue as a

member of the Board and be compensated in the same manner as other non-employee directors, except that his director compensation for 2019 would be prorated for the period following his retirement date.

In connection with the Company’s March 4, 2019 announcement that Mr. Powers had decided to retire as an officer of the Company effective July 1, 2019, the Company announced that Mr. Haack would be promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer effective upon Mr. Powers’s retirement. No changes were made to Mr. Haack’s compensation at the time his promotion was announced. Rather, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Haack’s compensation for fiscal 2020 at the time of the regular annual review for all executives as described below.

Primary Elements of Executive Compensation

In addition to the health benefit plans and programs generally available to all employees,The primary elements of our executive compensation program includesare the following elements:following:

Base Salary

Salaries of the Named Executive Officers are reviewed annually as well as at the time of a promotion or significant change in responsibilities. As described above, the Compensation Committee engaged L&A to conduct the compensation study at the beginning of fiscal 2017.2020. L&A’s compensation study was delivered to the Compensation Committee in May 2016. 2019.

The fiscal 20172020 base salaries for the Named Executive Officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, were set as follows:

Base salary for the Chief Executive Officer was set as follows. For Mr. Powers, - $800,000;the Compensation Committee increased his base salary 3.0% to $947,600 (annualized) for the period running from April 1, 2019 through his retirement on July 1, 2019. Mr. Kesler - $420,000;Haack’s base salary for fiscal 2020 was set by the Compensation Committee at $800,000, which is the base salary that Mr. Haack - $530,500; Mr. Stewart - $420,500; and Mr. Graass - $399,000. Powers had received upon his promotion to Chief Executive Officer in fiscal 2017.

Considerations that may influence the salary level for a Named Executive Officer include individual performance, the Named Executive Officer’s skills or experience, our operating performance and the nature and responsibilities of the position. Following the base salary adjustments, the salaries of the Named Executive Officers were, on average, between the median and the 75^th percentile of the L&A compensation study.

Annual Incentive Bonus

The Compensation Committee is responsible for approving the annual incentive bonus for our CEO and the other Named Executive Officers. Annual incentive bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 20172020 (other than Mr. Essl and Mr. Powers) were made under (1) the Eagle Materials Inc. Salaried Incentive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2017,2020, which we refer to as the “Eagle Annual Incentive Program,Program.” The Eagle Annual Incentive Program and (2) the Eagle Materials Inc. Special Situation Program for Fiscal Year 2017, which we refer to as the “SSP.” TheseCompany’s other incentive programs for fiscal 2020 were structured to create financial incentives and rewards that are directly related to corporate performance and the participating Named Executive Officer’s individual performance during the fiscal year. Our Incentive Plan provides an absolute cap on cash that any employee may receive in any fiscal year under such programs ($5 million).

The Compensation Committee believes these programs are consistent with our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy in that they place a significant portion of the executive’s compensation “at risk.” Generally, under these programs, a significant portion of the executive’s total compensation is dependent upon the performance of the Company as well as the individual’s performance. The Company’s annual incentive bonus programs also reflect the Committee’s philosophy of aligning the interests of our executives with those of the shareholders.stockholders. These programs create this alignment by providing that an officer’s annual bonus potential varies directly with our operating earnings. Although individual performance and achievement of goals (as discussed in more detail below under “Approving

the Annual Incentive Bonus”) may affect the actual incentive bonus amount, our programs are structured in such

a way that the executive officer’s incentive bonus potential can vary considerably as operating earnings change from year to year. The Committee believes that operating earnings is an appropriate metric for annual incentive bonuses because it is tied closely to operations, can be directly impacted by the efforts of the pool participants, and is a measure that our stockholders have indicated they track and value.

Eagle Annual Incentive Program

For fiscal 2017, each of our Named Executive Officers was a participant2020, Messrs. Haack, Kesler, Stewart and Graass were participants in the Eagle Annual Incentive Program. Under this program, during the first quarter of the fiscal year, a percentage of our operating earnings is designated by the Compensation Committee as a pool for bonuses, and each participating Named Executive Officer is assigned a share of such pool, representing the executive’s maximum bonus opportunity. At the end of the fiscal year, the size of the pool is determined, based on the amount of operating earnings generated during such fiscal year, and annual incentive bonuses are paid to each participating executive in the form of a lump sum cash payment reflecting hiseach executive’s share of the pool, subject to the exercise of “negative discretion” by the Compensation Committee to reduce (but not increase) the amount of the cash payment based on the executive’s individual performance during the fiscal year. The amount of the annual incentive bonus paid to an executive is based on the level of our operating earnings, the share of the pool designated for such executive, and an assessment of such executive’s individual performance.

The Compensation Committee addressed a couple of key changes in the Eagle Annual Incentive Program in the transition from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2017. First, the Committee needed to determine the appropriate pool percentage for Mr. Powers, who assumed the CEO position upon the retirement of Steven R. Rowley at the end of fiscal 2016. Second, Mr. Haack’s annual bonus potential had been initially established at the time of his hiring in fiscal 2015 as up to 200% of his base salary, with 100% as a target. The Committee decided to include Mr. Haack in the Eagle Annual Incentive Program bonus pool for fiscal 2017 in order to align his annual bonus potential with our operating earnings. The Eagle Annual Incentive ProgramFiscal 2020 was adopted by the Compensation Committee in May 2016,2019, and it differed frommirrored the structure of the fiscal 20162019 program. The program by (i) reducing the percentage potentially payablewas to the CEO from 40% in fiscal 2016 (Mr. Rowley) to 24% in fiscal 2017 (Mr. Powers) and reducing the percentage participation of the other plan participants (including Messrs. Kesler, Stewart and Graass), in part to allow the addition of Mr. Haack to the pool, and (ii) increasing the percentagebe funded with 1.2% of the Company’s operating earnings for fiscal 2020, which was a lower percentage than the 1.4% of operating earnings that fundhad funded the pool from 1.35% (fiscal 2016) to 1.40% (fiscal 2017).in recent years. The Compensation Committee reduced the funding rate for fiscal 2020 because one fewer executive would be participating in the pool.

The Committee believes that operating earnings is an appropriate measurement for annual incentive bonuses because this measure is tied more closely to operations. The bonus pool itself is not subject to a separate cap or maximum, but is merely a function of multiplying thepre-determined percentage by our operating earnings for the applicable fiscal year; however, our

Incentive Plan does provide an absolute cap on cash that any employee may receive in any fiscal year under such programs ($5 million). In setting the percentage of operating earnings which would fund the pool for the Eagle Annual Incentive Program, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including our compensation philosophy that a significant portion of the executive’s compensation should be “at risk” and subject to the Company’s success (level of operating earnings), as well as the anticipated operating earnings for fiscal 2017.2020.

In allocating each Named Executive Officer’s opportunity under the pool, the Compensation Committee considered the amount of annual incentive bonus compensation payable toopportunities of executives in other companies who fulfill similar roles as illustrated in the compensation study prepared by L&A, the share of the pool historically allocated to officers in such roles by the Company, Mr. Powers’sthe recommendation of Messrs. Powers and Haack for each participant (other than themselves), as well as the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the executive’s importance and contribution to the organization, the executive’s importance in driving the achievement of Company goals and profitability, the executive’s level of responsibility, and the anticipated operating earnings for fiscal 2017.2020. The Compensation Committee set the bonus potential for the Named Executive Officers as follows:

At the time the Compensation Committee set the bonus potential percentages, the anticipated operating earnings for fiscal 2017 yielded annual incentive bonus potentials that, when added to base salaries, would place the Named Executive Officers at slightly above the 75^th percentile of actual total cash compensation (base salary plus actual annual incentive) of the L&A compensation study.

Also at the beginning of fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee worked with Mr.Messrs. Powers and Haack to develop individual annual incentive goal categories by plan and position throughout the Company, including with respect to the Named Executive Officers.Officers (other than themselves). For participants in the Eagle Annual Incentive Program, the participants’ individual performance against the goals would be evaluated by the Committee in the exercise of “negative discretion” to reduce (but not increase) the amount

of the portion of the pool that would be paid to the participant at the end of the fiscal year.

At the end of fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee determined that the aggregate amount available for the Eagle Annual Incentive Program pool for fiscal 20172020 was $4,440,100. $3,845,353, based on the Company’s operating earnings of $320,446,048, as adjusted for certain extraordinary items that the Committee believes are not reflective of operating performance, including the non-cash impairment of various assets in our oil and gas proppants segment and costs related to the planned separation of our heavy and light businesses.

This pool amount was not quantifiable until the end of fiscal 20172020. For comparison purposes, the equivalent pool amount in fiscal 2019 was $4,597,239 based on operating earnings of $328,374,186 (as adjusted).

Divisional Annual Incentive Program

For certain employees who do not participate in the Eagle Annual Incentive Program, the Company maintains divisional annual incentive plans, which the Committee believes better tie such employees’ annual incentive compensation to metrics that they can directly influence than a Company-wide program. For fiscal 2020, Mr. Essl participated in a Divisional Annual Incentive Bonus Program. Under these programs, a percentage of a division’s operating earnings is allocated to the bonus pool and each participating employee is assigned a share of the pool, representing the employee’s maximum bonus opportunity. At the end of the fiscal year, the size of the pool is determined and annual bonuses are paid to participating employees in the form of a lump sum cash payment in accordance with their shares of the pool, subject to the exercise of negative discretion by our CEO (or, in the case of bonuses paid to Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee) based on the employee’s individual performance during the fiscal year.

Mr. Essl participated in the Eagle Materials Inc. Cement Companies Salaried Incentive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2020. Under this program, the bonus pool equaled 1.9% of the consolidated EBITDA for all of the Company’s cement companies, which is the same percentage the Compensation Committee has set for the past several years. In deciding to keep the percentage of EBITDA which

would fund this bonus pool the same as the prior year, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including our compensation philosophy that a significant portion of the executive’s compensation should be “at risk” and subject to the Company’s success (level of earnings).

The divisional bonus pools are not subject to a separate cap or maximum, but are merely a function of multiplying the pre-determined percentage by the applicable operating earnings for the applicable fiscal year. The aggregate amounts available for the Cement program for fiscal 2020 was $4,042,936, which was not quantifiable until the end of fiscal 2020 and includes amounts available for payment to officers and employees other than the Named Executive Officers. For comparison purposes, the equivalent pool amount in fiscal 20162019 was $3,183,771. From fiscal 2016$3,180,380.

In May 2019, the Compensation Committee set the annual incentive bonus potential for Mr. Essl under the Cement Divisional Annual Incentive Bonus Program. In determining Mr. Essl’s allocation of the pool, the Compensation Committee considered the recommendation of Mr. Haack, the amount of annual incentive bonus compensation payable to fiscal 2017, our operating earnings increased from $235,934,892 to $317,150,000, more individuals were participantsexecutives in other companies who fulfill similar roles as illustrated in the compensation study prepared by L&A, the portion of the pool historically allocated to his position and the pool was increased from 1.35%Compensation Committee’s assessment of operating earningshis importance and contribution to 1.40%his division’s performance, his importance as an officer within his division in driving the achievement of operating earnings.divisional goals and profitability and his level of responsibility. The Compensation Committee set Mr. Essl’s incentive bonus potential at 18% of his divisional bonus pool.

Fiscal 20172020 Special Situation Program

In the first quarter of fiscal 20172020 (May 2016)2019), the Compensation Committee approved the SSP,Eagle Materials Inc. Special Situation Program for Fiscal Year 2020, which we refer to as the “SSP,” which is a special annual incentive program intended to recognize outstanding individual performance during the fiscal year. The SSP also provides flexibility to reward performance when special circumstances arise in which our CEO determines that an individual has performed well but not been adequately compensated pursuant to other components of compensation, including without limitation instances where an individual’s compensation has been

adversely affected by market conditions such as a cyclical downturn or in recognition of transactions and events not contemplated at the time the Compensation Committee set compensation for the applicable year.

SSP awards are made by our CEO, except that awards to executive officers require Compensation Committee approval.approval (and our CEO does not have a role in the determination of any SSP award to himself). Awards under the SSP are not predetermined for any individuals at the beginning of the fiscal year. All full-time employees of Eagle Materials Inc. or any of our subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under this program. At the beginning of fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee determined that 0.35%0.20% of our operating earningsthe Company’s EBITDA for the ensuing fiscal year would fund the SSP, along with the portions of the Eagle and divisional incentive compensation plans and divisional long-term cash compensation plans not paid out. In setting the percentage of operating earningsEBITDA which would fund the SSP, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including the anticipated operating earningsEBITDA for fiscal 2017.2020. All of our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the SSP.

Approving the Annual Incentive Bonus

In May 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee approved the incentive bonus pool for fiscal 20172020 for the Company. In addition, at the end of fiscal 2017,2020, Mr. PowersHaack provided performance evaluations of each Named Executive Officer (other than himself) to the Compensation Committee, which evaluations included an assessment of the achievement of their individual goals and objectives, along with his recommendation for the annual incentive bonus for each such Named Executive Officer. WithMr. Powers did not receive an annual bonus, and with respect to Mr. Powers himself,Haack, the Compensation Committee performed its own evaluation of his performance and the extent to which the goals and objectives established for him for fiscal 20172020 had been achieved.

Mr. PowersHaack

At the end of fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee conducted its performance evaluation of Mr. PowersHaack after receiving input from the entire Board. Mr. PowersHaack also provided information used by the Compensation Committee to evaluate the achievement of his goals and objectives for fiscal 2017

2020 under the Eagle Annual Incentive Program. Based on this evaluation, which included both quantitative as well as discretionary factors, the Compensation Committee believes Mr. PowersHaack performed at a high level during fiscal 20172020 and met or exceeded his goals and objectives.objectives were substantially met. That evaluation resulted in Mr. PowersHaack receiving 98%90% of his bonus potential for fiscal 2017.2020. The Compensation Committee approved an annual incentive bonus for Mr. PowersHaack under the Eagle Annual Incentive Program of $1,044,312, which is reflected in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table located on page 38 of this proxy statement.$969,029. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee used its judgment to determine the appropriate award level after consideration of several factors, including his achievement of his goals related to safety, the performance of certain assets and leadership development and the following areas (among others) over the past fiscal year:

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a cash award under the SSP to Mr. PowersHaack in the amount of $100,000.$275,000. In making this discretionary award to Mr. Powers,Haack, the Compensation Committee took into consideration his achievementMr. Haack’s extraordinary leadership in guidingconnection with the Company through itsstrategic acquisition of Kosmos Cement, successful transition followingdivestiture of non-strategic business units, and extensive preparation for the retirement of Mr. Rowley, and his guidanceplanned separation of the Company through its first public debt offering. The SSP cash award to Mr. Powers is reflected in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 of this proxy statement.Company’s heavy and light businesses.

Mr. Kesler

At the end of fiscal 2017,2020, Mr. PowersHaack reviewed Mr. Kesler’s performance, finding that Mr. Kesler had achieved his goals during the fiscal year.performance. Based in part on this review, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Kesler had substantially met his goals and awarded Mr. Kesler 100%96% of his incentive bonus potential, approving an annual incentive bonus for Mr. Kesler under the Eagle Annual Incentive Program of $701,536, which is reflected$793,681. In making this determination, the

Compensation Committee used its judgment to determine the appropriate award level after consideration of several factors, including the input of Mr. Haack regarding Mr. Kesler’s performance and his achievement of his goals related to his areas of responsibility, including: Mr. Kesler’s successful execution of the Company’s investor relations function, and his development of a training and succession planning program through the finance department Company-wide.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a cash award under the SSP to Mr. Kesler in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column amount of $206,000. In making this award to Mr. Kesler, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the recommendation of Mr. Haack and Mr. Kesler’s extensive participation in divestitures of non-strategic business units, extensive preparatory work for the planned separation of the SummaryCompany’s heavy and light businesses (including capital structure matters), and his leadership in structuring and executing the financing for the Kosmos Cement acquisition.

Mr. Stewart

At the end of fiscal 2020, Mr. Haack reviewed Mr. Stewart’s performance. Based in part on this review, the Compensation Table located on page 38Committee determined that Mr. Stewart had substantially met his goals and awarded Mr. Stewart 95% of this proxy statement.his incentive bonus potential, approving an annual incentive bonus for Mr. Stewart under the Eagle Annual Incentive Program of $675,821. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee used its judgment to determine the appropriate award level after consideration of several factors, including his achievement of his goals related to refinements tohis areas of responsibility, the budgeting process,input of Mr. Powers’s inputHaack regarding Mr. Kesler’sStewart’s performance, and the following areas (among others) over the past fiscal year: Mr. Kesler’s timelyStewart’s implementation of executive transition planning, including engagement with internal constituents and effective completion and communication of required financial planning and analysis;external investor groups, his participation in evaluation of strategic growth opportunities forongoing investor outreach with regard to the Company;Company’s ESG initiatives, and his oversight ofwork streamlining the Company’s IT department, including enhanced cyber security training.strategic budgeting process.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a cash award under the SSP to Mr. KeslerStewart in the amount of $100,000.$75,000. In making this discretionary award to Mr. Kesler,Stewart, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the recommendation of Mr. PowersHaack and

Mr. Kesler’s successStewart’s investor communication efforts in guidingconnection with the Company through its first public debt offering. The SSP cash award to Mr. Kesler is reflected in the “Bonus” columnplanned separation of the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 of this proxy statement.Company’s heavy and light businesses.

Mr. HaackGraass

At the end of fiscal 2017, Mr. Powers reviewed Mr. Haack’s performance, finding that2020, Mr. Haack had achieved his goals duringreviewed the fiscal year.performance of Mr. Graass. Based in part on this review, the Compensation Committee determined

that Mr. HaackGraass had substantially met his goals and awarded Mr. Haack 97%Graass 95% of his incentive bonus potential, approving an annual incentive bonus for Mr. HaackGraass under the Eagle Annual Incentive Program of $732,172, which is reflected in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table located on page 38 of this proxy statement.$675,821. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee used its judgment to determine the appropriate award level after consideration of several factors, including his achievement of his goals related to safety and leadership development,his areas of responsibility, the input of Mr. Powers’s inputHaack regarding the performance of Mr. Haack’s performance,Graass, and the following areas (among others) over the past fiscal year: Mr. Haack’s success in enhancingenhancement of the Company’s safety programs; organization succession planning;internal policies and budgetingprocedures, development of certain employee training programs, and strategic planning throughoutoversight of the organization.Company’s process for negotiating and entering into material contracts.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a cash award under the SSP to Mr. Graass in the amount of $125,000. In making this award to Mr. Graass, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the recommendation of Mr. Haack and Mr. Graass’s extensive legal work in preparation for the planned separation of the Company’s heavy and light businesses, as well as legal work supporting the acquisition of Kosmos Cement.

Mr. StewartEssl

At the end of fiscal 2017,2020, Mr. PowersHaack reviewed the performance of Mr. Stewart’s performance, finding that Mr. Stewart had achieved his goals during the fiscal year.Essl. Based in part on this review, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. StewartEssl had met his goals and awarded Mr. Stewart 100%Essl 96% of his incentive bonus potential, approving an annual incentive bonus for Mr. StewartEssl under the Eagle AnnualMaterials Inc. Cement Companies Salaried Incentive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2020 of $701,536, which is reflected in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table located on page 38 of this proxy statement.$698,619. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee used its judgment to determine the appropriate award level after consideration of several factors, including his achievement of his goals related to safety and succession planning,his areas of responsibility, the input of Mr. Powers’s inputHaack regarding the

performance of Mr. Stewart’s performance,Essl, and the following areas (among others) over the past fiscal year: Mr. Stewart’s workEssl’s succession planning in preparation for his retirement; maintenance of a stringent capital project review process; driving the execution of the Company’s operational short-term and long-term strategies; maintaining the emphasis on a leadership succession program;low-cost production at all cement operations; and his formulation of effective investor communication tools.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a cash award under the SSP to Mr. Stewart in the amount of $100,000. In making this discretionary award to Mr. Stewart, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the recommendation of Mr. Powersinvolvement with various marketing and Mr. Stewart’s successful development and introduction of a leadership development program throughout the Company. The SSP cash award to Mr. Stewart is reflected in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 of this proxy statement.sales efforts.

Mr. Graass

At the end of fiscal 2017, Mr. Powers reviewed Mr. Graass’s performance, finding that Mr. Graass had achieved his goals during the fiscal year. Based in part on this review, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Graass had met his goals and awarded Mr. Graass 99% of his incentive bonus potential, approving an annual incentive bonus for Mr. Graass under the Eagle Annual Incentive Program of $694,520, which is reflected in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table located on page 38 of this proxy statement. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee used its judgment to determine the appropriate award level after consideration of several factors, including his achievement of his goals related to improvements to policies and procedures, Mr. Powers’s input regarding Mr. Graass’s performance, and the following areas (among others) over the past fiscal year: enhancement of certain training programs; and his participation in the pursuit of strategic growth opportunities for the Company.

In addition, the Compensation Committee approved a cash award under the SSP to Mr. Graass in the amount of $100,000. In making this discretionary award to Mr. Graass, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the recommendation of Mr. Powers and Mr. Graass’s work on the Company’s successful acquisition of CEMEX’s Ohio cement assets. The SSP cash award to Mr. Graass is reflected in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 of this proxy statement.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Consistent with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy of linking compensation to our performance, a significant portion of our long-term incentive compensation program for fiscal 20172020 has been structured to tie the ability to earn equity awards to the achievement by the Company of specific performance levels. To enhance retention of key employees, once earned, the performance awards contain a further time-vesting component. Also, a portion of our long-term compensation program has been structured as purely time-vesting, which the Compensation Committee believes, based on the input of L&A, isin-line with the practice of our peers. A more detailed description of the fiscal 20172020 awards is found below.

Burn Rate

The Compensation Committee has been a good steward of the equity available to it for award under our Incentive Plan. Our three-year average burn rate (a measure of historical dilution) is well below our industry norms. The Company’s three-year average burn rate (which is based on the number of awards granted—or, in the case of performance awards, awards earned—in each fiscal year, divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for such fiscal year) is 1.12%0.96%. The 20172020 benchmark for our industry published by ISS is 2.86%3.04%.

Grant Practice

All of the Named Executive Officers participate in our long-term incentive compensation program. In fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee approved equity grants as described below. The date on which an equity award is granted is the date specified in the resolutions of the Compensation Committee authorizing the grant. The grant date must fall on or after the date on which the resolutions are adopted by the Committee. As provided in the Incentive

Plan, for stock options, the exercise price is the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date, as reported by the NYSE.

In addition, the Compensation Committee, as provided in our Incentive Plan, has delegated to the Special Situation Stock Option Committee (whose sole member is our CEO) the authority to grant stock options to newly-hired employees and newly-promoted employees, under terms set by the Compensation Committee. This authority for fiscal 2018, which expires on May 31, 2018, is limited to an aggregate of 60,000 option shares; no one individual may receive more than 15,000 option shares in a given year; and Section 16 reporting persons may not receive awards pursuant to this authority. Stock options granted under this delegation of authority vest 20% per year commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. During fiscal 2017, 17,500 stock options were granted to employees under this authority out of a maximum of 60,000.

Fiscal 20172020 Grants

In structuring the long-term incentive program for fiscal 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee worked with our new CEO, Mr.Messrs. Powers and Haack to establish a mix of performance-based and time-vesting awards. TheConsistent with prior years, the performance metric selected was return on equity, or “ROE,” which represents our earnings as a percentage of our stockholders’ equity. equity, a performance metric that our stockholders have told us they find meaningful and that the Committee views as a measure of the Company’s prudent deployment of capital.

Target award amounts were allocated equally between performance-vesting and time-vesting awards, withone-half of each type being allocated to restricted stock andone-half to stock options; provided, that the Committee could take into consideration the recipient’s age and proximity to retirement in allocating some awards 100% to restricted stock. With respect to performance-based equity awards, the Committee determined a target award value that would be received upon the achievement of a strong ROE, with up to 120% of the target value received if exceptional ROE were achieved and 80% of the target value received if acceptable ROE were achieved. None of the performance-based equity awards would be earned if the return on equity were below this acceptable level. Both performance-based and time-vesting

equity awards would vest over a four-year period to enhance the retention of these key employees. The Committee anticipates being able to utilize this same basic structure in future years, to increase the consistency—and therefore the incentive power—of such awards.

Effective May 20, 2016,16, 2019, the Compensation Committee approved equity awards under the Incentive Plan to a group of key employees, including the Named Executive Officers, in alignment with the above structure. As part of the compensation study delivered to the Compensation Committee in May 2016,2019, L&A had provided information regarding long-term compensation as well as total direct compensation paid to the compensation peer group. In determining the value of the equity to be granted, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the L&A compensation study, Mr. Powers’sthe input of Messrs. Powers and Haack, the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the executive’s importance and contribution to the organization, and the executive’s level of responsibility. On average, the target Named Executive Officer long-term incentive compensation was at approximately the median of the compensation study, resulting in total direct compensation between the median and the 75^th percentile of the compensation study. The target grant date fair value was allocated 50% to performance-based equity (with a Company ROE financial metric) and 50% to time-vesting equity. In general, recipients of equity awards had their target grant date fair value allocated half to restricted stock and half to stock options; however, given their age and proximity to retirement, some recipients (including Messrs. PowersStewart and Stewart)Graass) had their entire award allocated to restricted stock.

The following table shows the stock options and restricted stock granted to each of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Powers) effective May 20, 2016:16, 2019:

The Committee believes that the structure of the fiscal 20172020 long-term compensation program is consistent with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy of linking compensation to our performance.

Performance-Based Equity Awards

These awards are comprised of shares of restricted stock and stock options which are earned based upon the achievement by the Company of a certain level of average ROE for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2020, with 100% of the awarded stock/options (that is, 120% of the target award value) being earned if such ROE measure was 18.0%20.0% or higher, 83.3% of the awarded stock/options (that is, 100% of the target award value) being earned if such ROE measure was 14.5%15.0%, and 66.7% of the awarded stock/options (that is, 80% of the target award value) being earned if such ROE measure was at least 11.0%10.0% (with the exact percentage of shares earned being calculated based on straight-line interpolation between the points specified above with fractional points rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent). If the Company achieved ana ROE measure of less than 11.0%10.0%, then none of the performance-based equity awards would be earned. The earned performance-based equity was to become fully vestedone-fourth promptly after the certification date andone-fourth on March 31 for each of the following three years (in each case assuming continued service through such dates).

The terms and conditions of the performance-based equity are substantially the same as prior performance-based awards, except that the performance criterion is as described above and the vesting period is four years.above. Any performance-based equity that was not earned at the end of fiscal 20172020 was to be forfeited. As in the case of prior equity awards, the performance-based equity will also vest upon a change in control of the Company. See “Change in Control Benefits” below. In accordance with the terms of the Incentive Plan, the exercise price of the stock options is the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant, May 20, 201616, 2019 ($75.69)91.58).

In May 2017,2020, the Compensation Committee certified that the Company’s 17.7%16.4% average ROE for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 (as defined in the award agreement)2020 satisfied the Company’s performance goal such that 98.6%88.0% of the performance-based equity granted (or 118.3%105.6% of the target number of shares/options) was earned. Any unearned performance-based equity was forfeited.One-fourthIn calculating the average ROE, in accordance with the award agreement, the Committee excluded the impact of certain extraordinary items not related to

operating performance, including the earned performance-based equity vested promptly after such certification date,non-cash impairment of various assets in our oil and gas proppants segment and costs related to the remaining three-fourths will vest ratably on March 31planned separation of 2018, 2019our heavy and 2020 (in each case assuming continued service through such dates).light businesses.

Time-Vesting Equity Awards

These awards are comprised of shares of restricted stock and stock options which vest ratably over four years on May 20, 2017; May 20, 2018; May 20, 2019;March 31, 2020; March 31, 2021; March 31, 2022; and May 20, 2010March 31, 2023 (in each case assuming continued service through such dates). The Compensation Committee believes that including time-vesting equity as part of long-term compensation is consistent with competitive pay practices, preserves the Company’s philosophy that a significant portion of an executive’s pay should be at risk, enhances the retention of key employees, while at the same time creating a strong incentive for management to operate the business in a manner that creates additional value for stockholders.

The terms and conditions of the time-vesting equity are substantially the same as prior time-vesting awards, except that the time-vesting period is four years.awards. As in the case of prior equity awards, the time-vesting equity will

also vest upon a change in control of the Company. See “Change in Control Benefits” below. In accordance with the terms of the Incentive Plan, the exercise price of the stock options is the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant, May 20, 201616, 2019 ($75.69)91.58).

Profit Sharing and Other Elements of Executive Compensation

Retirement Plan

Each of theOur Named Executive Officers, is a participant in our Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan, which we refer to as our “PSRP.” The PSRP is a qualified defined contribution plan coveringalong with substantially all salaried and hourly employees of the Company and our subsidiaries. Participants in thissubsidiaries are covered under our Retirement Plan, a qualified defined contribution plan under sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”).

Salaried participants, including our Named Executive Officers, covered under our Retirement Plan may elect to makepre-tax contributions and/or, after December 31, 2018, after-tax Roth 401(k) contributions of up to 70% of their base salary subject to the limit under Internal Revenue Code Section 402(g) (currently $18,000)($19,000 for calendar year 2019 and $19,500 for calendar year 2020), employeeafter-tax

contributions of up to 10% of base salary and, if the participant is at least age 50,“catch-up pre-tax “catch-up contributions” up to the statutory limit under Internal Revenue Code Section 414(v) (currently $6,000)($6,000 for calendar year 2019 and $6,500 for calendar year 2020). In addition, the PSRPour Retirement Plan provides for a discretionary employer profit sharing contribution for our salaried employees, including our Named Executive Officers, that is a percentage of base salary for the year.

Participants are fully vested to the extent of theirpre-tax, after-tax Roth 401(k), andafter-tax contributions and contributions. Prior to January 1, 2019, our salaried participants become vested in the employer profit sharing contribution over asix-year period (i.e., 20% per year beginning with the second year of service); after December 31, 2018, our salaried participants become vested in the employer profit sharing contribution over a four-year-period (i.e., 25% per year beginning with the first year of service). All of the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Haack, who joined the Company in December 2014) have been employed by the Company or our affiliates long enough to be fully vested. Participants are entitled to direct the investment of contributions made to the PSRPRetirement Plan on their behalf in various investment funds, including up to 15% in an Eagle Common Stock fund. Such amounts are payable upon a participant’s termination of employment, disability or death in the form of a lump sum, installments or direct rollover to an eligible retirement plan, as elected by the participant. At the participant’s election, amounts invested in the Common Stock fund are distributable in shares of our Common Stock.

Employer profit sharing contributions made to the PSRPRetirement Plan on behalf of our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 20172020 are reflected under the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table located on page 3841 of this proxy statement. A list of the investment funds provided under the PSRPRetirement Plan is provided in the footnotes to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table located on page 4650 of this proxy statement.

SERP

In fiscal 1995, the Board approved our Supplemental Executive Retirement Program, which we will refer to as our “SERP,” for certain employees participating in the PSRP.Retirement Plan. Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limits the amount of annual compensation (currently $265,000)($280,000 for calendar year 2019 and

$285,000 for calendar year 2020) that may be considered in determining our contribution to the PSRPRetirement Plan for the account of an eligible participant.

The SERP was established to eliminate the adverse treatment that higher-salaried employees receive as a result of such limit by making a contribution for each participant in an amount substantially equal to the additional employer profit sharing contribution that he or she would have received under the PSRPRetirement Plan had 100% of his or her base salary been eligible for a profit sharing contribution. As in the case of the PSRP,Retirement Plan, annual incentive bonuses paid to participants are not included when determining the amount of contributions to the SERP. The Compensation Committee believes that the SERP therefore allows us to confer the full intended benefit of the employer profit sharing contribution under the PSRPRetirement Plan without the arbitrary limitation of the Internal Revenue Code rules noted above.

Contributions accrued under the SERP for the benefit of the higher-salaried employees vest under the same terms and conditions as under the PSRP (i.e., over asix-year period)Retirement Plan and may be invested by the participant in several of the same investment options as offered under the PSRP.Retirement Plan. Benefits under the SERP are payable upon the participant’s termination of employment in a lump sum or installments as elected by the participant in accordance with the terms of the SERP, subject to the six month delay in payment for key employees under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A to the extent applicable.SERP. As with the PSRP,Retirement Plan, all of the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Haack, who joined the Company in December 2014) have been employed by the Company or our affiliates long enough to be fully vested.

Employer contributions tounder the SERP ofto our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 20172020 are reflected under the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table located on page 3841 of this proxy statement. A list of the investment funds provided under the PSRPRetirement Plan is provided in the footnotes to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table located on page 4650 of this proxy statement.

Salary Continuation Plan

The Named Executive Officers, along with other officers and key employees, are participants in our Salary Continuation Plan, which we refer to as the “SCP.” Under this plan, in the event of the death of

a participating

employee, we will pay such employee’s beneficiaries one full year of base salary in the first year following death and 50% of base salary each year thereafter until the date such employee would have reached normal Social Security retirement age, subject to a maximum amount of $1.5 million. Payments are made to the employee’s beneficiary on a semi-monthly basis.

The purpose of the plan is to provide some financial security for the families of the participating employees, which assists the Company in attracting and retaining key employees. Benefit amounts under the plan are intended to provide a basic level of support for beneficiaries. To cover these potential obligations, we pay the premiums on life insurance policies covering the life of each participating employee. Such policies are owned by the Company and proceeds from such policies would be initially paid to the Company.

Premiums paid on policies covering our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 20172020 are reflected under the “All Other Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table located on page 3841 of this proxy statement. Amounts potentially payable to the beneficiaries of our Named Executive Officers pursuant to the SCP are described in “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 4851 of this proxy statement.

Change in Control Benefits

During fiscal 2020, in order to better ensure the retention of our employees in the event of a potentially disruptive corporate transaction, we provided our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, with certain change-in-control protections. We believe that such protections, which are consistent with the practices of our peer companies, are in the best interest of our stockholders because they enable our executive leadership team to fully focus on the benefits of a corporate transaction for stockholders, rather than the potential adverse consequences of the transaction on their careers.

Change in Control Continuity Agreements

To better ensure the retention of our executive leadership team in the event of a potentially disruptive corporate transaction, on June 19, 2019, the Board approved change in control continuity agreements with Messrs. Haack, Kesler, Stewart and

Graass. The change in control continuity agreements provide that, in the event of a change in control during the term, a two-year protection period will commence during which the relevant executive will be entitled to compensation and benefits on terms that are generally no less favorable than those that applied prior to the change in control. We believe that such protections, which are consistent with the practices of our peer companies, are in the best interest of our stockholders because they enable our executive leadership team to fully focus on the benefits of a corporate transaction for stockholders, rather than the potential adverse consequences of the transaction on their careers and compensation.

In the event of the executive’s involuntary termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason during the two-year protection period, subject to the execution of a release of claims, he would be entitled to (a) cash severance equal to the product of (i) a severance multiple of 3 (for Mr. Haack), 2.5 (for Mr. Kesler) or 2 (for Messrs. Stewart and Graass), multiplied by (ii) the sum of his annual base salary and target annual bonus; (b) a prorated annual bonus for the year of termination; (c) a payment in lieu of employer retirement savings plan contributions that he would have received had his employment continued for 18 months (for Mr. Haack), 15 months (for Mr. Kesler) or 12 months (for Messrs. Stewart and Graass) post-termination; (d) a payment equal to the premium for continued participation in health insurance plans for 18 months (for Mr. Haack), 15 months (for Mr. Kesler) or 12 months (for Messrs. Stewart and Graass) post-termination; and (e) outplacement benefits of up to $30,000.

The change in control continuity agreements subject the executives to a perpetual confidentiality covenant and noncompetition covenants for 18 months (for Mr. Haack), 15 months (for Mr. Kesler) or 12 months (for Messrs. Stewart and Graass) post-termination. If any payments or benefits under the change in control continuity agreements would be subject to Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, such payments or benefits would be reduced to the extent that such reduction would place the executive in a better after-tax position. The initial term of the change in control continuity agreements is three years from the effective date of June 20, 2019, subject to automatic renewal for an additional year on each anniversary of the effective date.

All of our change in control continuity agreements have a “double-trigger” termination right (requiring both a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment in order to receive the change in control severance payments), and they do not include the long-term incentive values in the severance calculation or have tax gross-ups.

Under our change in control continuity agreements a “change in control” is defined generally as (i) the acquisition by any person or entity of 35% or more of our outstanding Common Stock or the voting power of outstanding securities entitled to vote in the election of directors; (ii) a change in the composition of our Board such that the current members of the Board cease to constitute a majority of the Board; (iii) the consummation of a merger, asset disposition, share exchange or similar transaction, unless (1) more than 50% of the stock following such transaction is owned by persons or entities who were stockholders of the Company prior to such transaction, (2) following such transaction, no person or entity owns 35% or more of the common stock of the entity resulting from such transaction, and (3) at least a majority of the members of the resulting corporation’s board of directors were members of our Board; or (iv) our stockholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company

See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 51 of this proxy statement.

Equity Awards

Awards granted in fiscal 2020 under our Incentive Plan are generally subject to accelerated vesting without regard to whether any applicable performance criteria have been or will be satisfied, upon the occurrence of a “change in control” as defined in the applicable award agreement.agreement if they are not assumed or replaced with equivalent awards in connection with such change in control. Under the award agreements or incentive program documents, a “change in control” is defined as generally as:

(i) the acquisition by any person or entity of 50% or more of the outstanding shares of any single class of our Common Stock or 40% or more of outstanding shares of all classes of our Common Stock;

(ii) a change in the composition of our Board such that the current members of the Board cease to constitute a majority of the Board; or

(iii) the consummation of a merger, dissolution, asset disposition, consolidation or share exchange, unless (1)(a) more than 50% of the stock following such transaction is owned by persons or entities who were stockholders of the Company prior to such transaction, (2)(b) following such transaction, no person or entity owns 40% or more of the common stock of the corporation resulting from such transaction, and (3)(c) at least a majority of the members of the resulting corporation’s board of directors were members of our Board.

If a change in control occurs, any unvested outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or cash awards would generally become immediately fully vested, and, in the case of stock options, exercisable or, in the case of restricted stock or RSUs, or cash awards, payable, unless the transaction resulting in each case without regardthe change in control provides that the award is to whether any applicable performance criteria have been or will be satisfied.replaced with an award of equivalent shares of the surviving parent corporation. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page 4851 of this proxy statement.

We believe the provision of these change in control benefits is generally consistent with market practice among our peers, is a valuable executive talent retention incentive and is consistent with the objectives of our overall executive compensation program. For example,

No Discriminatory Perquisites, Post-retirement Welfare Or Tax Gross-Ups

The Company does not provide perquisites or post-retirement welfare benefits to the equity vesting providesNamed Executive Officers. During employment, the Named Executive Officers participate in the broad-based employee health insurance plans available to employees with the same opportunities as stockholders, who are generally free to sell their equity at the time of the change in control event and thereby realizeCompany generally. Further, the value created at the timeCompany does not provide for gross-ups of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the transaction.Code to any of the Named Executive Officers.

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In order to align the interests of the Named Executive Officers with our stockholders, and to promote a long-term focus for the officers, the Board of Directors has adopted executive stock

ownership guidelines for the officers of the Company and our subsidiaries. The guidelines for the Named Executive Officers are expressed as a multiple of base salary as set forth below (with actual ownership reflected as of the record date for the annual meeting):

Once established, a participant’s ownership requirement generally does not change as a result of changes in his or her compensation or fluctuations in the price of our Common Stock but could change in the event of a promotion. Newly elected officers have five years to meet the applicable ownership requirement. Compliance with the ownership guidelines is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. Based on the current holdings of the Named Executive Officers, all of the Named Executive Officers have already achieved their stock ownership goal.

Limitations onNo Hedging

Under our insider trading policy, all of our directors and employees (including our Named Executive Officers) are prohibited from speculating in our

securities or engaging in transactions designed to hedge their ownership interests.

Consideration of the Tax Deductibility of Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction for public corporations for compensation over $1,000,000 paid in any fiscal year to the corporation’s chief executive officer and fourcertain other most highly compensated executive officers. However, this law exemptshistorically, Section 162(m) exempted performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements arewere met.

Our Incentive Plan has been approvedThe legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the 2017 Tax Act, made significant changes to Section 162(m) of the Code. The 2017 Tax Act expanded the executives

potentially affected by our stockholdersthe deduction limitation and Compensation Committee and otherwise meetsrepealed the requirements“performance-based compensation” exemption to Section 162(m), subject to a transition rule for performance-based compensation paid after 2017 under Internal Revenue Codecertain existing compensation arrangements covered by binding contractual arrangements in effect on November 2, 2017 that are not materially modified. Beginning with the 2018 calendar year, the $1 million annual deduction limitation under Section 162(m) applies to compensation paid to any individual who serves as the chief executive officer, chief financial officer or qualifies as one of the other three most highly compensated executive officers in 2017 or any later calendar year.

The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of the 2017 Tax Act on its compensation programs. The Company’s general intention is to maximize the tax deductibility of its compensation programs. However, the Compensation Committee intends to exercise its business judgment to develop compensation programs that best serve the interests of the Company and its stockholders, which may include paying compensation that is not fully deductible due to Section 162(m). The Eagle Annual Incentive Program is adopted underCompensation Committee uses its business judgment in establishing compensation policies to

attract and retain qualified executives to manage the structureCompany and to reward such executives for outstanding performance, while taking into consideration the financial impact of our Incentive Plan and is subject tosuch actions on the terms and conditions of that plan,Company, including the requirements for performance-based compensation. The Compensation Committee generally seeks whenever possibledeductibility of compensation paid to structure annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation awards, such as stock option and restricted stock grants under our Incentive Plan, in a manner that satisfies the Section 162(m) requirements, but reserves the right to award nondeductible compensation as it deems appropriate. Further, because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the related regulations, no assurance can be given that compensation intended byexecutives. Moreover, the Compensation Committee to satisfybelieves that the requirements for deductibility under section 162(m) doeslost deduction on compensation payable in fact do so.

Special Considerations Regarding ISS Pay for Performance Testing

Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) is a corporate governance advisory firm that annually issues voting recommendations to institutional investors regardingsay-on-pay votes conducted by publicly traded companies, including us. ISS’s“pay-for-performance” analysis contains a “relative degree of alignment” test over a three-year period. The analysis compares the relative alignment of our total stockholder return, as determined by ISS, and the percentile rank of our CEO compensation against that of a peer group of companies selected by ISS. ISS’s analysis this year (which will be published after we have distributed this proxy statement) will likely include the pay of our former CEO for twoexcess of the three years$1 million limitation for our Named Executive Officers is not material relative to the benefit of the performance period. We paybeing able to attract and retain talented management.

Compensation Risk

Although a significant portion of potential compensation to our current CEO less thanexecutive officers is performance-based, we paiddo not believe that our former CEO. Further skewing ISS’s analysis is the fact that the SEC’s disclosure requirements necessitated the artificial inflation ofcompensation policies, principles, objectives and practices are structured to promote inappropriate risk taking by our former CEO’s pay last year. As we explained in detail in footnotes 8 and 9 of the Summary Compensation Table in last year’s proxy statement, we were required to include both the grant date fair value and the revalued retirement-related value of the same awards in last year’s CEO compensation number, which we regard as double-counting.executives. We believe that any analysis which includesthe focus of our former CEO’s pay from last year should exclude the effectoverall compensation program encourages management to take a balanced approach that focuses on increasing and sustaining our profitability. See “Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight — Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs” on page 14 of this double-counting.proxy statement.